Lewis v. Randle et al (MAG+), No. 2:2009cv00809 - Document 27 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: JUDGMENT that (1) Plaintiff's 25 objections are overruled; (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's 22 recommendation is adopted; (3) Defendants' 15 motion to dismiss is granted; (4) This lawsuit is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 4/23/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(br, )
Download PDF
Lewis v. Randle et al (MAG+) Doc. 27 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION BENNIE FRANK LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. RICARDO RANDLE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv809-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's objections (Doc. No. 25) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 22) is adopted. (3) Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 15) is granted. (4) This lawsuit is dismissed for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 23rd day of April, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE