Williams v. GE Money Bank et al, No. 2:2009cv00718 - Document 39 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: JUDGMENT that plaintiff Douglas M. Williams's 37 MOTION to Dismiss with prejudice is granted and that defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc., and the claims against it are dismissed with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own co sts, attorneys' fees, and expenses; that any objection must be filed within seven days from the date of this order; that the clerk is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; that this case is now closed. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 8/9/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, ) Deadlines terminated: 08/20/2010 Pretrial and 09/20/2010 Jury Trial

Download PDF
Williams v. GE Money Bank et al Doc. 39 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION DOUGLAS M. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. GE MONEY BANK, a foreign corporation, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv718-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that plaintiff Douglas M. Williams’s motion to dismiss with prejudice defendant (doc. no. 37) is granted and that Experian Information Solutions, Inc., and the claims against it are dismissed with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs, attorneys’ fees, and expenses. The court assumes that defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc., has no objection to the allowance of the dismissal; however, if it does, it must file the objection within seven days from the date of this order. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is now closed. DONE, this the 9th day of August, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.