D. v. Chilton County Board of Education et al, No. 2:2009cv00691 - Document 35 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on this day, judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants, Chilton County Board of Education, Keith Moore, Benita Cahalane, and Heather Alford, and against the Plaintiff, o n the federal claims. The state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/6/2010. Copies furnished to YG, HC, EB. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn) [Modified on 4/6/2010 to reflect that the following deadlines have been terminated: Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/27/2010 and Jury Trial set for 6/21/2010.-DMN]

Download PDF

D. v. Chilton County Board of Education et al Doc. 35 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION D.D., by and through his next friend CATHY DAVIS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. CHILTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:09CV691-WHA (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on this day, judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants, Chilton County Board of Education, Keith Moore, Benita Cahalane, and Heather Alford, and against the Plaintiff, on the federal claims. The state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. Done this 6th day of April, 2010. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.