Franklin v. Garden State Life Insurance et al (MAG+), No. 2:2009cv00109 - Document 135 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: JUDGMENT overruling the Plaintiff's 126 Objections; adopting the Magistrate's 125 Recommendation; denying the 115 Motion to Set Aside Settlement; granting the 116 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and Dismiss with Prejudice; de nying all other motions as moot; enforcing the settlement and dismissing the lawsuit in its entirety with prejudice; ordering that the parties bear their own costs. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 2/24/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(br, )

Download PDF
Franklin v. Garden State Life Insurance et al (MAG+) Doc. 135 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION NUE CHEER FRANKLIN, Plaintiff, v. GARDEN STATE LIFE INSURANCE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv109-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's objections (Doc. No. 126) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 125) is adopted. (3) The plaintiff’s motion to set aside settlement (Doc. No. 115) is denied. Dockets.Justia.com (4) The defendants’ motion to enforce settlement and dismiss with prejudice (Doc. No. 116) is granted. (5) All other motions are denied as moot. (6) The settlement is enforced and this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that the parties are to bear their own costs. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 24th day of February, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.