Heenan v. Rhodes et al, No. 2:2009cv00075 - Document 84 (M.D. Ala. 2010)
Court Description: JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT AND DECREE of the court that: (1) the 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by defendants is granted; (2) judgment is entered against plf Judith Heenan and in favor of defendants with plf Heenan taking nothing by her complaint; further ORDERING that all other outstanding motions are denied as moot; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plf Heenan, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 12/27/10. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist). Furnished to calendar group & AG (terminates Jury Selection and Jury Trial 01/10/2011).(djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Heenan v. Rhodes et al Doc. 84 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JUDITH HEENAN, Plaintiff, v. MARILYN RHODES, DEBBIE GAGNON, CICELY BAUGH-HOOTEN, CAM HAMILTON, JUD MCCARTHA, JUANITA LANDERS, RAMONA LAZENBY, and ANITA ALL, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv75-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, AND DECREE of the court that: (1) The motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 44) filed by defendants Marilyn Rhodes, Debbie Gagnon, Cicely Baugh-Hooten, Cam Hamilton, Jud McCartha, Juanita Landers, Ramona Lazenby, and Anita All is granted. Dockets.Justia.com (2) Judgment is entered against plaintiff Judith Heenan and in favor of defendants Rhodes, Gagnon, BaughHooten, Hamilton, McCartha, Landers, Lazenby, and All, with plaintiff Heenan taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED that all other outstanding motions are denied as moot. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Heenan, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 27th day of December, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
