Patterson-Rudolph v. Jackson Hospital & Clinic et al (MAG+), No. 2:2008cv00883 - Document 48 (M.D. Ala. 2009)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: overruling Plaintiff's Objections 45 and 46 ; adopting 44 Magistrate Judge's Recommendation; granting Defendants' motions for summary judgment 24 , 26 , 28 , 30 ; entering Judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 8/28/09. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(br, )Deadlines terminated: Final Pretrial Conference 09/11/2009; Jury Trial 10/13/2009

Download PDF
Patterson-Rudolph v. Jackson Hospital & Clinic et al (MAG+) Doc. 48 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION DONNA PATTERSON-RUDOLPH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JACKSON HOSPITAL & CLINIC, ) INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv883-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's objections (Doc. Nos. 45 & 46) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 44) is adopted. (3) Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 24, 26, 28, & 30) are granted. Dockets.Justia.com (4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 28th day of August, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.