Abdullah v. The Alabama Sentencing Commission et al (MAG+), No. 2:2008cv00855 - Document 22 (M.D. Ala. 2009)

Court Description: JUDGMENT, in accordance with the Memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) plf's 20 objections are overruled; (2) the 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge is adopted; (3) defs' 8 motion to dismiss is granted; (4) defs' 8 and 13 motions for summary judgment are denied as moot; (5) this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 9/22/09. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
Abdullah v. The Alabama Sentencing Commission et al (MAG+) Doc. 22 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION MUSTAFA JADEED ABDULLAH, Plaintiff, v. THE ALABAMA SENTENCING COMMISSION and LYNDA FLYNT in her capacity as director, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv855-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's objections (Doc. No. 20) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 19) is adopted. (3) Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 8) is granted. Dockets.Justia.com (4) Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 8 & 13) are denied as moot. (5) This lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 22nd day of September, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.