Andrews v. United States of America (INMATE3), No. 2:2008cv00803 - Document 5 (M.D. Ala. 2008)
Court Description: JUDGMENT overruling petitioner's 3 objections; adopting 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 1 Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4) petition for habeas corpus; taxing costs against petitioner, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 10/20/2008. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Andrews v. United States of America (INMATE3) Doc. 5 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION OSCAR ANDREWS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv803-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 3) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 2) is adopted. (3) The Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4) petition for habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 20th day of October, 2008. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
