Ellis v. Sadeek (INMATE1) (CONSENT), No. 2:2008cv00790 - Document 14 (M.D. Ala. 2009)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT that: (2) the 6 motion to dismiss filed by defendant Sadeek be granted to the extent the defendant seeks dismissal of this case due to the plaintiff's failure to exhaust the administrative remedy currently available to him at th e Bullock Correctional Facility; (2) the claims against defendant Sadeek be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 42 USC 1997e(a) for the plaintiff's failure to exhaust the administrative remedy presently available to him at the Bullock Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 2/4/09. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(sl, )

Download PDF

Ellis v. Sadeek (INMATE1) (CONSENT) Doc. 14 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WILLIAM LANIER ELLIS, SR., #259380, Plaintiff, v. DR. SADEEK, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-CV-790-SRW [WO] FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered herewith, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT AND DECREE of this court that: 1. The motion to dismiss filed by defendant Sadeek be GRANTED to the extent the defendant seeks dismissal of this case due to the plaintiff's failure to exhaust the administrative remedy currently available to him at the Bullock Correctional Facility. 2. The claims against defendant Sadeek be DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for the plaintiff's failure to exhaust the administrative remedy presently available to him at the Bullock Correctional Facility. Done, this 4th day of February, 2009. /s/ Susan Russ Walker SUSAN RUSS WALKER CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.