Cremeens v. The City of Montgomery, No. 2:2008cv00546 - Document 56 (M.D. Ala. 2009)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT as follows: (1) With respect to all remaining claims in this action judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant against Gary Cremeens and the opt-in plaintiffs, with them taking nothing by their claims; (2) Costs are TAXED in favor of De fendant against Cremeens and the opt-in plaintiffs for which execution may issue; and (3) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket sheet as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to close this file. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 10/7/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Cremeens v. The City of Montgomery Doc. 56 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION GARY CREMEENS, PLAINTIFF, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, DEFENDANT. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:08-cv-546-MEF (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the Court as follows: (1) With respect to all remaining claims in this action judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant against Gary Cremeens and the opt-in plaintiffs, with them taking nothing by their claims. (2) Costs are TAXED in favor of Defendant against Cremeens and the opt-in plaintiffs for which execution may issue. (3) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket sheet as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to close this file. DONE this the 7 th day of October, 2009. /s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
