Knight v. Mitchem et al (INMATE1), No. 2:2008cv00356 - Document 38 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: JUDGMENT that petitioner's 35 objections are overruled; that respondents' 31 objections are overruled; that 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS is adopted; that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue; that the clerk is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuantto Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 11/30/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, )

Download PDF
Knight v. Mitchem et al (INMATE1) Doc. 38 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION TOMMY JAMES KNIGHT, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) BILLY MITCHEN, Warden, and ) TROY KING, Attorney ) General of the State of ) Alabama, ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv356-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The petitioner’s objections (doc. no. 35) are overruled. (2) The respondents' objections (Doc. No. 31) are overruled. (3) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 28) is adopted. Dockets.Justia.com (4) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 30th day of November, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.