Knight v. Mitchem et al (INMATE1), No. 2:2008cv00356 - Document 33 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) the respondents' 31 objections are overruled; (2) the [28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge is ad opted; (3) the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 11/12/10. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF

Knight v. Mitchem et al (INMATE1) Doc. 33 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION TOMMY JAMES KNIGHT, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) BILLY MITCHEN, Warden, and ) TROY KING, Attorney ) General of the State of ) Alabama, ) ) Respondents. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv356-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The respondents' objections (Doc. No. 31) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 28) is adopted. (3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 12th day of November, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.