-CSC Morton v. Allen et al (INMATE1), No. 2:2008cv00303 - Document 51 (M.D. Ala. 2011)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER as follows: 1. That the Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. That the defendants' motion for summary judgment regarding the plaintiff's claims for monetary damages lodged against them in their official capacities be and is hereby GRANTED as the defendants are entitled to absolute immunity from these claims. 3. That motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of Richard Allen and Frank Albright with respect to each of the plaintiff's claims presented agains t these defendants in the remaining aspects of their official capacities and in all aspects of their individual capacities be and is hereby GRANTED. 4. That motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of Espanolia Nicholson with respect to the plaint iff's equal protection and due process claims against this defendant in the remaining aspects of her official capacity and in all aspects of her individual capacity be and is hereby GRANTED. 5. That motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of Espanolia Nicholson with respect to the plaintiff's excessive force claims against this defendant in her official capacity and in all aspects of her individual capacity be and is hereby DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 6/20/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION MISTY MORTON, #209144, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD ALLEN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv303-MEF ) ) ) ) OPINION and ORDER On May 23, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 50). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. That the defendants motion for summary judgment regarding the plaintiff s claims for monetary damages lodged against them in their official capacities be and is hereby GRANTED as the defendants are entitled to absolute immunity from these claims. 3. That motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of Richard Allen and Frank Albright with respect to each of the plaintiff s claims presented against these defendants in the remaining aspects of their official capacities and in all aspects of their individual capacities be and is hereby GRANTED. 4. That motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of Espanolia Nicholson with respect to the plaintiff s equal protection and due process claims against this defendant in the remaining aspects of her official capacity and in all aspects of her individual capacity be and is hereby GRANTED. 5. That motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of Espanolia Nicholson with respect to the plaintiff s excessive force claims against this defendant in her official capacity and in all aspects of her individual capacity be and is hereby DENIED. th Done this the 20 day of June, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
