Coggins v. Fuller, No. 2:2008cv00261 - Document 5 (M.D. Ala. 2008)

Court Description: JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court: (1) that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is granted to the extent that plf's complaint shall be filed without the prepayment of f ees; and (2) that plf's complaint is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii); further ORDERING that the motion for an appendix 3 is denied as moot; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/8/08. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
Coggins v. Fuller Doc. 5 Case 2:08-cv-00261-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 04/08/2008 Page 1 of 2 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION GENE COGGINS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. MARK E. FULLER, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv261-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court: (1) That the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is granted to the extent that plaintiff Gene Coggins’s complaint shall be filed without the prepayment of fees; and (2) That plaintiff Coggins’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii). It is further ORDERED that the motion for an appendix (Doc. No. 3) is denied as moot. Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:08-cv-00261-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 04/08/2008 Page 2 of 2 It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Coggins, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 8th day of April, 2008. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.