Jones v. Forniss et al (INMATE2), No. 2:2008cv00220 - Document 59 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

Court Description: JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the 58 Opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff Boykin Jones's 57 objections are overruled; (2) The United States Magistrate Judge 9;s 56 recommendation is adopted; (3) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Nikkita Shambray and against plaintiff Jones, with plaintiff Jones taking nothing by his complaint; it is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Jones, for which execution may issue; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 3/7/11. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
Jones v. Forniss et al (INMATE2) Doc. 59 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION BOYKIN JONES, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. NIKKITA SHAMBRAY, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv220-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff Boykin Jones’s objections (doc. no. 57) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge’s recommendation (doc. no. 56) is adopted. (3) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Nikkita Shambray and against plaintiff Jones, with plaintiff Jones taking nothing by his complaint. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Jones, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 7th day of March, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.