McCray v. Astrue (MAG+), No. 2:2008cv00209 - Document 24 (M.D. Ala. 2009)
Court Description: JUDGMENT it is the Order, Judge, and Decree of the court as follows: 1) Plaintiff's objections (doc. no. 22 ) are overruled; 2) The US Mag Judge's recommendation doc. 21 is adopted; 3) The decision of dft Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed; It is further Ordered that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue; The clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 1/30/09. (Attachments: # 1 appeals checklist)(vma, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
McCray v. Astrue (MAG+) Doc. 24 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION BRENDA McCRAY for B.M., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv209-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. No. 22) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge’s recommendation (Doc. No. 21) is adopted. (3) The decision of defendant Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 30th day of January, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
