Penmont, LLC et al v. Blue Ridge Piedmont, LLC et al, No. 2:2008cv00093 - Document 107 (M.D. Ala. 2009)
Court Description: AMENDED JUDGMENT granting 105 Joint Motion For Entry of Consent Dismissal With Prejudice; that Plaintiffs hereby state that through the course of discovery they determined that none of the defendants committed any fraud in connection with the trans action underlying this litigation; that the clerk is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 6/15/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Penmont, LLC et al v. Blue Ridge Piedmont, LLC et al Doc. 107 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION PENMONT, LLC and PENMAN GROUP, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. BLUE RIDGE PIEDMONT, LLC, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv93-MHT (WO) AMENDED JUDGMENT Upon consideration of the joint motion for entry of consent dismissal with prejudice (Doc. No. 105), it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that the motion is granted and that this cause is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs hereby state that through the course of discovery they determined that none of the defendants committed any fraud in connection with the transaction underlying this litigation. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 15th day of June, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
