Wise v. United States of America (INMATE 3), No. 2:2008cv00017 - Document 33 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: JUDGMENT in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it it the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The 29 Petitioner's Objection are overruled; (2) The 26 United States Magistrate Judge's Recommenda tion is adopted; and (3) The 1 The 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgmentpursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 2/19/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, )

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION DAVID DEJUAN WISE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv17-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 29) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 26) is adopted. (3) The 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 19th day of February, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.