White v. Giles et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2008cv00016 - Document 59 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: JUDGMENT that plaintiff's 57 objections are overruled; that the US Magistrate Judge's 56 recommendation is adopted; that defendants' 9 , 21 , 22 , 26 , 29 , and 42 motions for summary judgment are granted; that Judgment is e ntered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by his complaint; that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue; that the clerk is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 8/31/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, )
Download PDF
White v. Giles et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 59 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION FRANK WHITE, Plaintiff, v. J.C. GILES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv16-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The plaintiff’s objections (Doc. No. 57) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge’s recommendation (Doc. No. 56) is adopted. (3) Defendants' motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 9, 21, 22, 26, 29, and 42) are granted. (4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and Dockets.Justia.com against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by his complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 31st day of August, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE