Strickland v. Hooks et al (INMATE3), No. 2:2007cv01052 - Document 18 (M.D. Ala. 2009)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the magistrate judge's 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION is adopted and the petition for habeas-corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1 ) is denied. It is further ORDERED that costs a re taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 11/23/2009. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Strickland v. Hooks et al (INMATE3) Doc. 18 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION TOMMY STRICKLAND, #124708, Petitioner, v. RALPH HOOKS, WARDEN, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv1052-MHT (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings and orders of the court, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the magistrate judge’s recommendation (Doc. # 16) is adopted and the petition for habeas-corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. # 1) is denied. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Done this 23rd day of November, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
