Charest v. Williams et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2007cv00984 - Document 122 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) the plf's 119 objections are overruled; (2) the US Mag Judge's 116 recommendation is adopted; (3) defs' 21 & [ 85] motions for summary judgment are granted; (4) judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plf, with plf taking nothing by his complaint; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 7/23/10. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
Download PDF
Charest v. Williams et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 122 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION PATRICK J. CHAREST, Plaintiff, v. SIDNEY WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv984-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The plaintiff’s objections (Doc. No. 119) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge’s recommendation (Doc. No. 116) is adopted. (3) Defendants' motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 21 & 85) are granted. Dockets.Justia.com (4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by his complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 23rd day of July, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE