Rounsavall v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Company, Inc., No. 2:2007cv00784 - Document 73 (M.D. Ala. 2009)
Court Description: JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the dft and against the plf; That costs be taxed against the plf for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 1/23/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rounsavall v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Company, Inc. Doc. 73 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PEGGY ROUNSAVALL, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Defendant. CASE NO. 2:07-cv-784-MEF (WO) JUDGMENT On the 16th day of January, 2009, after this cause had been submitted to a jury, a verdict was returned by the jury as follows: We, the jury, find in favor of: ______ the plaintiff Peggy Rounsavall and award her compensatory damages in the amount of $__________________ or / the Defendant, Progressive Specialty Insurance Company, Inc. SO SAY WE ALL. DONE this 16th day of January, 2009. /s/ Jimmie L. DeRamus FOREPERSON It is, therefore, the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the Court: 1. That judgment is entered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff; Dockets.Justia.com 2. That costs be taxed against the plaintiff for which execution may issue. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and close this file. DONE this 23rd day of January, 2009. /s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
