Mann v. Darden et al, No. 2:2007cv00751 - Document 86 (M.D. Ala. 2009)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that judgment is entered in favor of defendant James A. Darden and against plaintiff Sue-zanne Mann. with plaintiff Mann taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed ag ainst plaintiff Mann, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 7/29/2009. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn)
Download PDF
Mann v. Darden et al Doc. 86 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION SUE-ZANNE MANN, Plaintiff, v. JAMES A. DARDEN and CAMILLE V. EMMANUEL, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv751-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT On the 28th day of July, 2009, after this cause had been presented to a jury, a verdict was returned as follows: I. First Incident of Tasing (1) Do you find that defendant James A. Darden is entitled to discretionary function immunity? Yes X No _______ If you find that Darden is protected by discretionary function immunity, you need not go any further as to this incident. If you find that he is not protected by Dockets.Justia.com discretionary function immunity, then you should continue to the next question. XXX II. Second Incident of Tasing (3) Do you find that defendant James A. Darden is entitled to discretionary function immunity? Yes X No _______ If you find that Darden is protected by discretionary function immunity, you need not go any further as to this incident. If you find that he is not protected by discretionary function immunity, then you should continue to the next question. XXX SO SAY WE ALL. /s/ Merrit E. Ash Foreperson DATED: 7/28/09 It is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that judgment is entered in favor of defendant James A. Darden and against plaintiff Sue-Zanne Mann, with plaintiff Mann taking nothing by her complaint. 2 It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Mann, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 29th day of July, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE