-SRW Mann v. Darden et al, No. 2:2007cv00751 - Document 146 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

Court Description: CORRECTED JUDGMENT directing that it is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that judgment is entered in favor of defendant James A. Darden and against plaintiff Sue-Zanne Mann, with plaintiff Mann taking nothing by her complaint; f urther ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Mann, for which execution may issue; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/24/11. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
-SRW Mann v. Darden et al Doc. 146 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION SUE-ZANNE MANN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. JAMES A. DARDEN, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv751-MHT (WO) CORRECTED JUDGMENT On the 23rd day of August 2011, after this cause had been presented to a jury, a verdict was returned as follows: I. Tasing Incident (1) Stage One: Do you find that defendant James A. Darden is entitled to prevail at stage one? Yes X No _____ If you find that Darden prevails at stage one, you need not go any further. If you find that he does not prevail at stage one, then you should continue to stage two. XXX Dockets.Justia.com SO SAY WE ALL. /s/ Keith Judy Foreperson It is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that judgment is entered in favor of defendant James A. Darden and against plaintiff SueZanne Mann, with plaintiff Mann taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Mann, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 24th day of August, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.