Arrington v. Alabama State University, No. 2:2007cv00717 - Document 43 (M.D. Ala. 2008)
Court Description: JUDGMENT as follows: (1) Defendant's 12 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant AL State University and against plaintiff Vicky Arrington; and (3) Costs are taxed against plaintiff Arrington, for w hich execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. (**JS & JT set for 12/1/08 are CANCELED). Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 11/25/2008. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Arrington v. Alabama State University Doc. 43 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION VICKY ARRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv717-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the opinion entered on this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant Alabama State University’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 12) is granted. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Alabama State University and against plaintiff Vicky Arrington, with plaintiff Arrington taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Arrington, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 25th day of November, 2008. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
