Taylor v. United States of America (INMATE 3), No. 2:2007cv00404 - Document 25 (M.D. Ala. 2009)
Court Description: JUDGMENT, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The US Magistrate Judge's 23 Recommendation is adopted; (2) The 28 USC 2255 petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 4/27/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Taylor v. United States of America (INMATE 3) Doc. 25 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION BRIDGET V. TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv404-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 23) is adopted. (2) The 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 27th day of April, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
