John Deere Credit et al v. Hoover et al, No. 2:2007cv00150 - Document 18 (M.D. Ala. 2007)

Court Description: JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT. Ordered as follows: (1) plaintiffs John Deere Construction & Forestry Company, Inc. and Deere & Company's 14 motion for entry of default judgment is granted; (2) plaintiffs shall have and recover $84,293.45 from defe ndant Kimberly Hoover. Ordered that costs are taxed against defendant Kimberly Hoover, for which execution may issue. The Clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/23/07. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (TERM: PT-10/15/07; NJT-11/26/07)(sl, )

Download PDF
John Deere Credit et al v. Hoover et al Doc. 18 Case 2:07-cv-00150-MHT-CSC Document 18 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JOHN DEERE CONSTRUCTION & FORESTRY COMPANY, INC., and DEERE & COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiffs, v. KIMBERLY HOOVER, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. ) 2:07cv150-MHT ) (WO) ) ) ) JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiffs John Deere Construction & Forestry Company, Inc. and Deere & Company’s motion for entry of default judgment (Doc. No. 14) is granted. (2) Plaintiffs John Deere Construction & Forestry Company, Inc., and Deere & Company shall have and recover $ 84,293.45 from defendant Kimberly Hoover. Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-00150-MHT-CSC Document 18 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 2 of 2 It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against defendant Kimberly Hoover, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 23rd day of July, 2007. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.