Dunklin v. Riley et al (INMATE1) FILE NO DISCOVERY, No. 2:2006cv01063 - Document 57 (M.D. Ala. 2009)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff, that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice; that costs are taxed against the plaintiff; that the clerk is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 10/29/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dunklin v. Riley et al (INMATE1) FILE NO DISCOVERY Doc. 57 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF NORTHERN DIVISION WILLIE EARL DUNKLIN, #174406, Plaintiff, v. BOB RILEY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-1063-MEF (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions and orders of the court, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff, that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice, and costs are taxed against the plaintiff. The clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this the 29th day of October, 2009. /s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
