Minnifield v. Pritchard (INMATE 1), No. 2:2006cv01044 - Document 25 (M.D. Ala. 2009)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that summary judgment is ENTERED in favor of Dft, and against Plf, and that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 USC 1997e(a) for Plf's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy available to him during his confinement in the Bullock County Jail; DIRECTING the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 6/12/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )
Download PDF
Minnifield v. Pritchard (INMATE 1) Doc. 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION KENNEDY MINNIFIELD, #130651, Plaintiff, v. CURTIS PRITCHARD, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:06-CV-1044-WKW[WO] FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the court, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that summary judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant, and against Plaintiff, and that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust an administrative remedy available to him during his confinement in the Bullock County Jail. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this 12th day of June, 2009. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.