Cox v. Allen et al (INMATE1) DO NOT ACCEPT DISCOVERY REQUESTS UNLESS HAVE LEAVE OF COURT, No. 2:2006cv00989 - Document 42 (M.D. Ala. 2009)
Court Description: JUDGMENT it is Ordered and Adjudged that judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff; It is further Ordered that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue; The clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 5/8/09. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(vma, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Cox v. Allen et al (INMATE1) DO NOT ACCEPT DISCOVERY REQUESTS UNLESS HAVE LEAVE OF COURT Doc. 42 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DERRICK COX, #140603, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD ALLEN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 2:06-cv-989-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the Court, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 8th day of May, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
