Morefield v. Marshall et al (INMATE2), No. 2:2006cv00976 - Document 36 (M.D. Ala. 2009)

Court Description: JUDGMENT as follows: (1) the petitioner's 34 objections are overruled; (2) the 31 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) the petitioner for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Ordered that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 4/29/09. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(sl, )

Download PDF
Morefield v. Marshall et al (INMATE2) Doc. 36 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION ALONZO MOREFIELD, JR, Petitioner, v. D.T. MARSHALL, Sheriff, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv976-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 34) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 31) is adopted. (3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 29th day of April, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.