Savage v. Marshall et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2006cv00827 - Document 7 (M.D. Ala. 2006)

Court Description: ORDER as follows: (1) The petitioner's 5 objections are overruled; (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's 4 recommendation is adopted; (3) The 1 Petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied because petitioner has failed to exhaust s tate remedies. Costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/28/2006. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, )
Download PDF
Savage v. Marshall et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 7 Case 2:06-cv-00827-MHT-DRB Document 7 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 1 of 2 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION THOMAS SAVAGE, Petitioner, v. D.T. MARSHALL, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv827-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 5) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 4) is adopted. (3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied because petitioner has failed to exhaust state remedies. Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-00827-MHT-DRB Document 7 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 2 of 2 It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 28th day of September, 2006. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE