Cornelius et al v. Willis et al, No. 2:2006cv00312 - Document 90 (M.D. Ala. 2009)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendants, on Count One in the 58 Second Amended Complaint. It is further ORDERED that Cornelius's remaining state-law claims in Counts Three through Six of the S econd Amended Complaint are DISMISSED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3). It is further ORDERED that all costs herein incurred are TAXED against Cornelius, for which let execution issue. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 2/26/2009. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn)

Download PDF

Cornelius et al v. Willis et al Doc. 90 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RANDY CORNELIUS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF ANDALUSIA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:06-CV-312-WKW (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions and orders of the court, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendants, on Count One in the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. # 58). It is further ORDERED that Cornelius’s remaining state-law claims in Counts Three through Six of the Second Amended Complaint are DISMISSED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). It is further ORDERED that all costs herein incurred are TAXED against Cornelius, for which let execution issue. DONE this 26th day of February, 2009. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.