Alexander et al v. Certegy Check Services, Inc., No. 2:2005cv00449 - Document 63 (M.D. Ala. 2006)
Court Description: VACATED PER ORDER OF 10/25/06 - doc. 65***FINAL JUDGMENT it is hereby Ordered that: 1) Pursuant to Rule 68 of the FRCP, judgment is hereby entered in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant; Plaintiff Willie C. Alexander shall recover � 36;5,000 inclusive of costs accrued from the defendant and Plaintiff Belinda B. Pitman shall recover $5,000 inclusive of costs accrued from the defendant; 2) This case is dismissed with prejudice; 3) Costs are taxed as paid; 4) All pending motio ns are denied as moot; The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/23/06. (Attachments: # 1 appeals checklist)(vma, ) Modified on 10/25/2006 (vma, ).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Alexander et al v. Certegy Check Services, Inc. Doc. 63 Case 2:05-cv-00449-WKW-VPM Document 63 Filed 10/23/2006 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION WILLIE C. ALEXANDER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CERTEGY CHECK SERVICES, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:05-cv-449-WKW (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT Upon consideration of the Notice Re Offer of Judgment filed by the plaintiffs on August 15, 2006 (Doc. # 55), and the Joint Notice of Resolution of Motion for Fees filed by the parties on October 23, 2006 (Doc. # 62), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, judgment is hereby entered in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant. Plaintiff Willie C. Alexander shall recover $5,000 inclusive of costs accrued from the defendant and Plaintiff Belinda B. Pitman shall recover $5,000 inclusive of costs accrued from the defendant. 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. Costs are taxed as paid. 4. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this 23rd the day of October, 2006. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
