Perkins v. Whaley, et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2002cv01369 - Document 25 (M.D. Ala. 2005)
Court Description: ORDER granting 20 Motion for Relief from Judgment. The 17 Opinion and 18 Final Judgment entered on 12/17/2004 are VACATED. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further appropriate proceedings as warranted by this order. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/19/2005. (dmn)
Download PDF
Perkins v. Whaley, et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 25 Case 2:02-cv-01369-MHT-DRB Document 25 Filed 04/19/2005 Page 1 of 2 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAM A NORTHERN DIVISION CHARLES PERKINS, AIS #169906, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. PAUL WHALEY, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:02-CV-1369-T (WO) ORDER ON MOTION On November 22, 2004, the M agistrate Judge entered a Recommendation that this case be dismissed due to the plaintiff’s failure to provide the court with his correct address. The plaintiff filed no objections to the Recommendation. The court therefore adopted the Recommendation and entered judgment on December 17, 2005. On M arch 9, 2005, the plaintiff filed a motion for relief from judgment in which he argues that he provided the court with a correct address prior to entry of the Recommendation and that the Clerk erred in failing to note his change of address. Specifically, Perkins maintains that letters he mailed to the Clerk in August of 2004 “had plaintiff’s address of Bibb County [Correctional Facility] on the letter head and ret urn address.” Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Judgment at 2. The evidentiary materials submitted by the plaintiff support this assertion. See Amendment to Motion for Relief from Judgment - Exhibits B and C. The order of procedure entered in this case merely directs the plaintiff to notify the court of any change in his address and no particular type of notice Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:02-cv-01369-MHT-DRB Document 25 Filed 04/19/2005 Page 2 of 2 is required by this order. See Order of December 23, 2002 - Court Doc. No. 3 at 3. M oreover, the Clerk routinely utilizes both return addresses on envelopes and addresses contained in correspondence to change addresses provided by inmates. However, the Clerk apparently failed to take such action in this case. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (Court Doc. No. 20) be and is hereby GRANTED. 2. The Opinion (Court Doc. No. 17) and Final Judgment (Court Doc. No. 18) entered in this case on December 17, 2004 be and are hereby VACATED. 3. This case be referred back to the M agistrate Judge for further appropriate proceedings as warranted by this order. Done, this the 19th day of April, 2005. /s/ M yron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.