Rogers, et al v. State Personnel Dept, et al, No. 2:2000cv00109 - Document 130 (M.D. Ala. 2006)
Court Description: JUDGMENT denying 95 Motion for Summary Judgment as to the 2000 promotion to the extent plaintiff seeks prospective injunctive relief from the defendants in their official capacities ; that said motion is granted in all other respects ; directing the clerk of court to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/23/2006. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(ag, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rogers, et al v. State Personnel Dept, et al Case 2:00-cv-00109-MHT-VPM Doc. 130 Document 130 Filed 03/23/2006 Page 1 of 2 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION ROBERT L. ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL HALEY, etc., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:00cv109-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: (1) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 95) is denied as to the 2000 promotion to the extent plaintiff seeks prospective injunctive relief from the defendants in their official capacities. (2) Said motion is granted in all other respects. Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:00-cv-00109-MHT-VPM Document 130 Filed 03/23/2006 Page 2 of 2 The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Done, this the 23rd day of March, 2006. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
