Reynolds v. Dept/Transportation, et al, No. 2:1985cv00665 - Document 8981 (M.D. Ala. 2013)

Court Description: JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) claimant Jerry Pogue's 8939 Objections are overruled; (2) the special master's 8924 REPORT AND RE COMMENDATION regarding claimant Pogue's individual-contempt claim against defendants is ADOPTED; (3) the defendants' 8353 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; (4) judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against claimant Pogue, with claimant Pogue taking nothing by his individual-contempt claim; directing the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/9/13. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
Reynolds v. Dept/Transportation, et al Doc. 8981 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JOHNNY REYNOLDS, et al., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:85cv665-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Claimant Jerry Poque’s objections (Doc. No. 8939) are overruled. (2) The special master’s recommendation regarding claimant Poque’s individual-contempt claim against defendants (Doc. No. 8924) is adopted. (3) The defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 8353) is granted. Dockets.Justia.com (4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against claimant Pogue, with claimant Pogue taking nothing by his individual-contempt claim. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 9th day of August, 2013. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.