Whitt v. Brazier et al (INMATE 2), No. 1:2021cv00708 - Document 22 (M.D. Ala. 2022)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's 20 recommendation is adopted; (2) This lawsuit is dismissed wit hout prejudice for failure to comply with court orders to respond; No costs are taxed; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/29/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF

Whitt v. Brazier et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 22 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION HEATH WHITT, Plaintiff, v. JAMES BRAZIER, Commander, and DONALD VALENZA, Sheriff, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21cv708-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. 20) is adopted. (2) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with court orders to respond. No costs are taxed. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment Dockets.Justia.com pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 29th day of July, 2022. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.