Millette v. Valenza (INMATE 2), No. 1:2021cv00189 - Document 46 (M.D. Ala. 2022)
Court Description: OPINION. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/29/2022. (am, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Millette v. Valenza (INMATE 2) Doc. 46 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION DOMINIC ANTHONY MILLETTE, Plaintiff, v. DONALD VALENZA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21cv189-MHT (WO) OPINION Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, who at the time was incarcerated in the Houston County, Alabama Jail, filed this lawsuit complaining that he was denied constitutionally adequate care because after being given the first dose of a vaccine in jail, he was not provided with the second mandatory dose, which needed because he was in a high-risk environment. he As relief, he sought only a court order to provide the second dose of the vaccine. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate without Judge prejudice that as plaintiff’s moot, case because be dismissed plaintiff is no Dockets.Justia.com longer in the jail. recommendation. review of the There are no objections to the After record, an the independent court and concludes de novo that the magistrate judge’s recommendation should be adopted. An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE, this the 29th day of December, 2022. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
