Mathis v. Brooks et al (INMATE 2), No. 1:2020cv00768 - Document 4 (M.D. Ala. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) the 2 motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; (3) this case DISMISSED without prejudice for the plf's failure to pay the full filing and administrative fees upon the initiation of this case; a separate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 12/18/2020. (djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Mathis v. Brooks et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 4 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION RAYMOND MATHIS, #140252, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. D.P.O. BROOKS, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACT. NO. 1:20-cv-768-ECM OPINION and ORDER On September 30, 2020, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 3) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that as follows: 1. the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is DENIED; 3. this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff’s failure to pay the full filing and administrative fees upon the initiation of this case. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Done this 18th day of December, 2020. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
