Thomas v. Watson (INMATE 1), No. 1:2019cv00381 - Document 37 (M.D. Ala. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: On September 22, 2020, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 36 ) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff's failures to prosecute this action and comply with the orders of this Court. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 10/8/2020. (kh, )

Download PDF

Thomas v. Watson (INMATE 1) Doc. 37 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION GLEN EDWARD THOMAS, ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 1:19-cv-381-ECM ) (WO) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. CHRIS WATSON, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER On September 22, 2020, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 36) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff’s failures to prosecute this action and comply with the orders of this Court. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Done this 8th day of October, 2020. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.