Hicks v. Berryhill (CONSENT), No. 1:2017cv00359 - Document 23 (M.D. Ala. 2018)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) With respect to all claims in this action against Dft Nancy A. Berryhill, judgment is ENTERED in favor of Dft Nancy A. Berryhill and against Plf Cynthia M. Hicks, w ith Plf taking nothing by her claims; (2) Costs are TAXED as paid; (3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket sheet as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP and to close the file. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 10/9/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF
Hicks v. Berryhill (CONSENT) Doc. 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CYNTHIA M. HICKS, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 1:17-cv-359-GMB [WO] FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) With respect to all claims in this action against Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill and against Plaintiff Cynthia M. Hicks, with Plaintiff taking nothing by her claims. (2) Costs are TAXED as paid. (3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket sheet as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to close the file. DONE this 9th day of October, 2018. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.