Scott v. Caylor et al (INMATE 1)(NO DISCOVERY, DOC 32), No. 1:2016cv00862 - Document 62 (M.D. Ala. 2019)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER (1) ADOPTING 61 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; (2) the Defs' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; (3) judgment is entered in favor of the defendants; (4) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and (5) costs are taxed against the plf for which execution may issue; a separate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 10/24/19. (djy, )

Download PDF
Scott v. Caylor et al (INMATE 1)(NO DISCOVERY, DOC 32) Doc. 62 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION EIBE SCOTT, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. COFFEE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACT. NO. 1:16-cv-862-ECM (WO) MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER On September 27, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 61) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, and for good cause, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 3. judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants; 4. this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 5. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff for which execution may issue. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Done this 24th day of October, 2019. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.