Hamm et al v. Shahverdians et al, No. 1:2014cv00332 - Document 33 (M.D. Ala. 2014)
Court Description: JUDGMENT that is is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs, as further set out in order; further ORDERING that all outstanding motions are denied as moot; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/4/14. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist). Furnished to calendar group & AG (terminates Final Pretrial Conference 02/06/2015; Jury Trial 03/09/2015).(djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hamm et al v. Shahverdians et al Doc. 33 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION MATHEW FOSTER HAMM and NIKKI HAMM, Plaintiffs, v. VAZGEN S. SHAHVERDIANS, an individual, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14cv332-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT The court having been informed through the notice concerning mediation (doc. no. 32) that this cause is now settled, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs and with leave to the parties, within 49 days, to stipulate to a different basis for dismissal or to stipulate to the entry of judgment instead of dismissal, and with leave to any party to file, within 49 days, a motion to have the dismissal set aside and Dockets.Justia.com the case reinstated or the settlement enforced, should the settlement not be consummated. It is further ORDERED that all outstanding motions are denied as moot. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 4th day of December, 2014. /s/ Myron H. Thompson_____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Civil
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
