Thomas v. Moody, No. 1:2013cv00920 - Document 109 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT is entered on the federal claim in Count I in favor of Dft Darren Moody against the Plf, Katherine Thomas; The court declines to exercise jurisdiction over the state claims against the Dfts in Counts II, III, and IV of the Amended Comp laint and those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice; Costs are taxed against the Plf. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/12/2015. (furn: calendar, eb)(term: PTC for 08/26/2015; Jury Trial for 09/28/2015)(Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Thomas v. Moody Doc. 109 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION KATHERINE THOMAS, individually, and ) as the administrator of the estate of Christopher) Jerome Thomas, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:13cv920-WHA ) DARREN MOODY, in his individual capacity,) (wo) and CITY OF DOTHAN, ALABAMA, ) ) Defendants. ) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered in the case on this day, Final Judgment is entered on the federal claim in Count I in favor of Defendant Darren Moody and against the Plaintiff, Katherine Thomas. The court declines to exercise jurisdiction over the state claims against the Defendants in Counts II, III, and IV of the Amended Complaint and those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. DONE this 12th day of August, 2015. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
