Cherch v. Mock et al (INMATE 2), No. 1:2013cv00586 - Document 39 (M.D. Ala. 2016)

Court Description: OPINION and ORDER: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 38 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and this case be and is hereby DISMISSED as follows: 1. Defendants' 33 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Final Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/19/2016. (dmn, ) Modified on 9/19/2016 to reflect correct signature date, 9/19/2016. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION KENNETH CHERCH, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER JIM MOCK, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-586-WHA ) [WO] ) ) ) OPINION and ORDER On August 26, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Doc. 38. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and this case be and is hereby DISMISSED as follows: 1. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Doc. 33) is GRANTED; 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Final Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants. Done, this 19th day of September, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.