Howell v. Giles et al (INMATE 2), No. 1:2012cv01041 - Document 21 (M.D. Ala. 2016)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the Respondents and against the Petitioner, and this petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/29/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Howell v. Giles et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES E. HOWELL, #260 462, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, vs. J. C. GILES, et al., Respondents. CASE NO. 1:12-cv-1041-WHA (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the order of the court entered in this case on this day, Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Respondents, and against the Petitioner, and this petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this 29th day of March, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
