Owens v. Bishop, et al (INMATE 1), No. 1:2012cv01009 - Document 19 (M.D. Ala. 2014)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the 17 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is here by ADOPTED, that the petition for habeas corpus relief be and is hereby DENIED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 2/5/14. (scn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION FREDERICK OWENS, AIS #170249, Petitioner, v. JESSE BISHOP et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12cv1009-MEF (WO) OPINION and ORDER On December 18, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case recommending that the petition of habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). (Doc. # 17). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, that the petition for habeas corpus relief be and is hereby DENIED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Done this the 5th day of February, 2014. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
