Bagley v. Cash (CONSENT), No. 1:2012cv00620 - Document 21 (M.D. Ala. 2013)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the 19 memorandum opinion and based on the parties' 20 joint stipulation, and for good cause, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby ENTERED in favor of the plaintiff and a gainst the defendant on its breach of contract claim, and the plaintiff be and is hereby AWARDED damages in the amount of $7,350,000.00 in compensatory damages; further ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudi ce, and no costs taxed herein; the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 2/1/13. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bagley v. Cash (CONSENT) Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES W. BAGLEY, TRUSTEE OF THE BAGLEY FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. PETER L. CASH, Defendant. CIVIL ACT. NO. 1:12cv620-CSC (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion (doc. # 19) entered on January 12, 2013, and based on parties’ joint stipulation filed on February 1, 2013 (doc. # 20), and for good cause, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby ENTERED in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant on its breach of contract claim, and the plaintiff be and is hereby AWARDED damages in the amount of $7,350,000.00 in compensatory damages. It is further ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, and no costs taxed herein. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Done this 1st day of February, 2013. /s/Charles S. Coody CHARLES S. COODY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
