Flowers v. Patrick et al, No. 1:2011cv01099 - Document 26 (M.D. Ala. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER directing that, upon consideration of Plaintiff's 25 motion, which the Court construes as a motion for an order of dismissal, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and that Plaintiff's claims ag ainst Michael Patrick are DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear his own costs; the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment under Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 5/8/13. (Furnished to Calendar/WR)(Term'd: Final PTC 11/01/2013 and Jury Trial 12/02/2013) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF

Flowers v. Patrick et al Doc. 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DANIEL FLOWERS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL PATRICK, Defendant. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-1099-MEF (WO – Do Not Publish) ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Doc. #25), which the Court construes as a motion for an order of dismissal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. #25), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and that Plaintiff’s claims against Michael Patrick are DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear his own costs. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment under Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this the 8th day of May, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.